Chicago Sky · G · 2026 stats, contract & trade value
Add Cloud to the Trade Machine →In 2026, Cloud is outproducing her contract by 6.2 pts of talent. She's a free agent after this season, so the figure reflects her 2026 salary alone.
Projected per stat on the fitted league aging curves (scoring fades, rebounding holds, minutes drive late decline) — 4,700 player-seasons, 1997–2025. Ranges are 10th–90th percentile from held-out backtest error. Years marked FA are past her current deal — projection only.
| Season | Team | GP | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | TOV | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | WAS | 34 | 19.3 | 3.6 | 2.8 | 3.4 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 32.3% | 23.7% | 68.1% |
| 2016 | WAS | 31 | 24.3 | 5.7 | 3.0 | 3.8 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 34.8% | 33.8% | 75.4% |
| 2017 | WAS | 24 | 18.6 | 4.4 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 31.4% | 23.5% | 74.1% |
| 2018 | WAS | 27 | 26.5 | 8.6 | 3.2 | 4.6 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 43.6% | 38.6% | 77.8% |
| 2019 | WAS | 34 | 32.2 | 9.0 | 2.5 | 5.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 39.4% | 32.6% | 68.3% |
| 2021 | WAS | 27 | 31.6 | 8.7 | 3.6 | 6.4 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 2.2 | 38.9% | 27.4% | 83.6% |
| 2022 | WAS | 34 | 31.3 | 10.7 | 3.6 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 2.8 | 39.9% | 31.9% | 82.4% |
| 2023 | WAS | 37 | 32.4 | 12.7 | 3.7 | 6.2 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 2.6 | 37.7% | 29.8% | 90.0% |
| 2024 | PHO | 38 | 33.3 | 11.5 | 4.1 | 6.9 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 3.0 | 39.7% | 30.8% | 82.6% |
| 2025 | NYL | 41 | — | 10.1 | 3.7 | 5.1 | 1.2 | 0.3 | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | CHI | 33 | 28.5 | 10.2 | 3.2 | 5.0 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 46.5% | 32.1% | 85.1% |
| Season | Talent | PPG | RPG | APG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 45 | 8.6 | 3.1 | 4.4 |
| 2028 | 41 | 7.1 | 2.7 | 3.9 |
Future-year talent figures above are projections on the league aging curve (fit from 4,692 player-seasons, 1997–2025), not measurements — they fade in the display because they should.How the projections work →
Her attribute profile scored against each team's current roster deficits — where she'd fill the biggest hole, not just where she'd be fun.
A fair package each interested team would have to send for Natasha Cloud — assembled and priced by the same engine that grades trades, most valuable pieces first until the outgoing value matches hers. Open one in the machine to tweak it.
A starting point, not a prediction — each package is the fewest fair pieces by model value, and a real deal would flex around roster fit and both front offices. “Needs a filler” means the salaries don't yet fit under the cap without another piece.
The closest player-seasons in league history (1997–2025) to her current age, per-36 profile, and role — the careers her projection walks alongside.
