WNBAGM

Natasha Mack

Phoenix Mercury · F · 2026 stats, contract & trade value

Add Mack to the Trade Machine →
Talent score
53
#44 in the W
Trade value
60
#32 in the W
Contract surplus
+16.5
talent vs. salary expectation
Position
F
Talent & trade value 20–9966+ star40–65 rotationunder 40 fringe

Over her deal through 2027, Mack is outproducing her contract by 16.5 pts of talent — contract surplus averages every remaining year, with future seasons projected on the league aging curve and discounted.

Natasha Mack headshot

Natasha Mack

53
Phoenix Mercury · F · age 28
Value & contract
Talent
53
Starter
Trade value
60
Starter
Surplus
+16.5
Underpaid
Talent trend53– flat
954320
LG AVG
Last 30 daysToday
Contract2 yrs · $0K gtd
2026$304KNON-GTD
2027$289KNON-GTD
GuaranteedNon-guaranteedTeam option

Box scoreper game · 36 GP
PoorGreatpercentile vs qualified
Points
54
8.9
Assists
30
1.1
Rebounds
88
6.7
Usage
25
15.1 %
Efficiency
95
64 % TS
On-court impactwRAPM · 1,417 poss · 2026-09-13
PoorGreatpercentile vs qualified
Offense
71
+0.1
Defense
64
+0.0

wRAPM — her effect on team net scoring per 100 possessions, adjusted for teammates and opponents.

Stands out for efficiency and rebounding; usage is the soft spot. Reads as a Starter-level talent.
Talent outlook
2026
53 talent
2027
51 proj
45–58
2028 · FA
50 proj
43–58

Projected per stat on the fitted league aging curves (scoring fades, rebounding holds, minutes drive late decline) — 4,700 player-seasons, 1997–2025. Ranges are 10th–90th percentile from held-out backtest error. Years marked FA are past her current deal — projection only.

Career stats
SeasonTeamGPMPGPPGRPGAPGSPGBPGTOVFG%3P%FT%
2021CHI35.32.01.30.00.00.00.766.7%0.0%100.0%
2021MIN12.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0%0.0%0.0%
2024PHX4015.53.85.01.10.71.20.757.3%0.0%57.9%
2025PHX3418.34.75.80.90.91.50.457.3%0.0%47.2%
2026PHX3622.68.96.71.10.91.30.960.3%22.2%81.4%
Projected · 2027–2028
SeasonTalentPPGRPGAPG
2027517.25.91.1
2028506.75.71.1

Future-year talent figures above are projections on the league aging curve (fit from 4,692 player-seasons, 1997–2025), not measurements — they fade in the display because they should.How the projections work →

Best team fits

Her attribute profile scored against each team's current roster deficits — where she'd fill the biggest hole, not just where she'd be fun.

Portland Fire17-27 · thinnest in rebounding / size + scoring · 1.9M space
build this trade · fit score 49
New York Liberty26-18 · thinnest in playmaking / ball-handling + perimeter defense · 0.4M space
build this trade · fit score 46
Los Angeles Sparks16-28 · thinnest in playmaking / ball-handling + perimeter defense · 0.5M space
build this trade · fit score 45

What would it take?

The fair package each team would have to send for Natasha Mack, built and graded by the same engine that grades trades. A deal only appears if it’s cap-legal both ways and lands within one letter grade on both sides — the model’s bar for a fair trade. Sorted by which teams most need her; open one in the machine to tweak it.

Toronto Tempo sendsTOR B · PHX C
Laura Juskaite
open this trade in the machine →
Portland Fire sendsPOR C+ · PHX B-
Emily Engstler2027 1st
open this trade in the machine →
New York Liberty sendsNY B- · PHX C+
Pauline Astier
open this trade in the machine →
Los Angeles Sparks sendsLA C+ · PHX B-
Rae Burrell2027 1st
open this trade in the machine →
Atlanta Dream sendsATL B- · PHX C
DeWanna Bonner
open this trade in the machine →
Connecticut Sun sendsCONN C+ · PHX B-
Leila Lacan
open this trade in the machine →
Seattle Storm sendsSEA C · PHX B
Flau'jae Johnson
open this trade in the machine →
Washington Mystics sendsWSH B · PHX C
2027 1stCotie McMahon
open this trade in the machine →

A starting point, not a prediction — each package is the fewest fair pieces the model can assemble, and a real deal would flex around roster fit and both front offices.

Phoenix Mercury teammates

Aging comps

The closest player-seasons in league history (1997–2025) to her current age, per-36 profile, and role — the careers her projection walks alongside.

  • Cheyenne Parker-Tyus · 2019 · age 27
  • Amanda Zahui B · 2019 · age 26
  • Jessica Breland · 2014 · age 27

Durability context: 35% of her 40 nearest comps had no qualified season two years on — projection ranges assume she's still playing.

Similar players