WNBAGM

Cameron Brink

Los Angeles Sparks · F · 2026 stats, contract & trade value

Add Brink to the Trade Machine →
Talent score
45
#65 in the W
Trade value
42
#72 in the W
discounted while out — healthy ≈ 46
Contract surplus
+0.5
talent vs. salary expectation
Position
F
Talent & trade value 20–9966+ star40–65 rotationunder 40 fringe

Over her deal through 2027, Brink is outproducing her contract by 0.5 pts of talent — contract surplus averages every remaining year, with future seasons projected on the league aging curve and discounted.

Cameron Brink headshot

Cameron Brink

45
Los Angeles Sparks · F · age 24
Value & contract
Talent
45
Rotation
Trade value
42
Replacement
Surplus
+0.5
Fair value
Talent trend45– flat
954320
LG AVG
Last 30 daysToday
Contract2 yrs · $558K gtd
2026$494KNON-GTD
2027$558KGTD
GuaranteedNon-guaranteedTeam option

Box scoreper game · 31 GP
PoorGreatpercentile vs qualified
Points
60
9.5
Assists
47
1.5
Rebounds
82
5.0
Usage
83
23.4 %
Efficiency
67
58 % TS
On-court impactwRAPM · 1,201 poss · 2026-09-13
PoorGreatpercentile vs qualified
Offense
3
−3.0
Defense
69
+0.2

wRAPM — her effect on team net scoring per 100 possessions, adjusted for teammates and opponents.

Stands out for usage and rebounding; offense is the soft spot. Reads as a Rotation-level talent.
Talent outlook
2026
45 talent
2027
46 proj
41–52
2028 · FA
47 proj
41–55

Projected per stat on the fitted league aging curves (scoring fades, rebounding holds, minutes drive late decline) — 4,700 player-seasons, 1997–2025. Ranges are 10th–90th percentile from held-out backtest error. Years marked FA are past her current deal — projection only.

Career stats
SeasonTeamGPMPGPPGRPGAPGSPGBPGTOVFG%3P%FT%
2024LAS1522.07.55.31.71.12.32.339.8%32.3%84.0%
2025LAS1912.95.14.30.50.51.41.342.7%29.4%76.2%
2026LA3119.29.55.01.50.61.82.446.4%31.5%77.1%
Projected · 2027–2028
SeasonTalentPPGRPGAPG
2027468.94.81.5
2028479.25.01.5

Future-year talent figures above are projections on the league aging curve (fit from 4,692 player-seasons, 1997–2025), not measurements — they fade in the display because they should.How the projections work →

Best team fits

Her attribute profile scored against each team's current roster deficits — where she'd fill the biggest hole, not just where she'd be fun.

Portland Fire17-27 · thinnest in rebounding / size + scoring · 1.9M space
build this trade · fit score 45
Connecticut Sun11-33 · thinnest in scoring + playmaking / ball-handling · 1.0M space
build this trade · fit score 41
Seattle Storm8-36 · thinnest in playmaking / ball-handling + scoring · 0.7M space
build this trade · fit score 38

What would it take?

The fair package each team would have to send for Cameron Brink, built and graded by the same engine that grades trades. A deal only appears if it’s cap-legal both ways and lands within one letter grade on both sides — the model’s bar for a fair trade. Sorted by which teams most need her; open one in the machine to tweak it.

Toronto Tempo sendsTOR C · LA B-
Laura Juskaite
open this trade in the machine →
Chicago Sky sendsCHI B- · LA C+
Skylar Diggins
open this trade in the machine →
Indiana Fever sendsIND C+ · LA B-
2027 1stSophie Cunningham
open this trade in the machine →
Portland Fire sendsPOR C+ · LA C+
Jordan Harrison
open this trade in the machine →
New York Liberty sendsNY C+ · LA C+
Satou Sabally
open this trade in the machine →
Dallas Wings sendsDAL C+ · LA C+
Awak Kuier
open this trade in the machine →
Atlanta Dream sendsATL B- · LA C
Naz Hillmon
open this trade in the machine →
Connecticut Sun sendsCONN C+ · LA B-
Aaliyah Edwards
open this trade in the machine →
Seattle Storm sendsSEA C+ · LA B-
Natisha Hiedeman
open this trade in the machine →
Golden State Valkyries sendsGSV C+ · LA C+
Tiffany Hayes
open this trade in the machine →
Washington Mystics sendsWSH C+ · LA B-
Lauren Betts
open this trade in the machine →

A starting point, not a prediction — each package is the fewest fair pieces the model can assemble, and a real deal would flex around roster fit and both front offices.

Los Angeles Sparks teammates

Aging comps

The closest player-seasons in league history (1997–2025) to her current age, per-36 profile, and role — the careers her projection walks alongside.

  • Jonquel Jones · 2016 · age 23
  • Margo Dydek · 1999 · age 26
  • Vanessa Hayden · 2006 · age 25

Similar players