WNBAGM

Rickea Jackson

Chicago Sky · F · 2026 stats, contract & trade value

Add Jackson to the Trade Machine →
Talent score
47
#60 in the W
Trade value
46
#60 in the W
discounted while out — healthy ≈ 50
Contract surplus
+5.0
talent vs. salary expectation
Position
F
Talent & trade value 20–9966+ star40–65 rotationunder 40 fringe

Over her deal through 2027, Jackson is outproducing her contract by 5.0 pts of talent — contract surplus averages every remaining year, with future seasons projected on the league aging curve and discounted.

Rickea Jackson headshot

Rickea Jackson

47
Chicago Sky · F · age 25
Value & contract
Talent
47
Rotation
Trade value
46
Rotation
Surplus
+5
Underpaid
Talent trend47– flat
954320
LG AVG
Last 30 daysToday
Contract2 yrs · $487K gtd
2026$431KNON-GTD
2027$487KGTD
GuaranteedNon-guaranteedTeam option

Box scoreper game · 4 GP

Below the >70%-of-team-games qualified cutoff — percentiles are indicative, still ranked against the qualified pool.

PoorGreatpercentile vs qualified
Points
92
18.0
Assists
62
2.0
Rebounds
80
4.8
Usage
97
28.4 %
Efficiency
30
52 % TS
Stands out for usage and scoring. Reads as a Rotation-level talent.
Talent outlook
2026
47 talent
2027
49 proj
44–55
2028 · FA
49 proj
43–57

Projected per stat on the fitted league aging curves (scoring fades, rebounding holds, minutes drive late decline) — 4,700 player-seasons, 1997–2025. Ranges are 10th–90th percentile from held-out backtest error. Years marked FA are past her current deal — projection only.

Career stats
SeasonTeamGPMPGPPGRPGAPGSPGBPGTOVFG%3P%FT%
2024LAS4028.813.43.91.50.70.31.945.6%34.7%80.7%
2025LAS38—14.73.21.7——————
2026CHI429.518.04.82.00.31.82.040.0%28.6%81.8%
2026 proj—40—14.53.71.50.60.4————
Projected · 2027–2028
SeasonTalentPPGRPGAPG
20274914.03.51.8
20284914.03.41.9

Future-year talent figures above are projections on the league aging curve (fit from 4,692 player-seasons, 1997–2025), not measurements — they fade in the display because they should.How the projections work →

Best team fits

Her attribute profile scored against each team's current roster deficits — where she'd fill the biggest hole, not just where she'd be fun.

Connecticut Sun11-33 · thinnest in scoring + playmaking / ball-handling · 1.0M space
build this trade · fit score 41
Portland Fire17-27 · thinnest in rebounding / size + scoring · 1.9M space
build this trade · fit score 38
Seattle Storm8-36 · thinnest in playmaking / ball-handling + scoring · 0.7M space
build this trade · fit score 38

What would it take?

The fair package each team would have to send for Rickea Jackson, built and graded by the same engine that grades trades. A deal only appears if it’s cap-legal both ways and lands within one letter grade on both sides — the model’s bar for a fair trade. Sorted by which teams most need her; open one in the machine to tweak it.

Toronto Tempo sendsTOR C+ · CHI C+
Julie Allemand
open this trade in the machine →
Atlanta Dream sendsATL C · CHI B-
DeWanna Bonner
open this trade in the machine →
Connecticut Sun sendsCONN C+ · CHI C+
Aaliyah Edwards
open this trade in the machine →
Portland Fire sendsPOR C · CHI B-
Emily Engstler
open this trade in the machine →
Seattle Storm sendsSEA C · CHI B
2027 1stMackenzie Holmes
open this trade in the machine →
New York Liberty sendsNY C+ · CHI C+
Leonie Fiebich
open this trade in the machine →
Washington Mystics sendsWSH C+ · CHI C+
Lauren Betts
open this trade in the machine →
Los Angeles Sparks sendsLA C+ · CHI C+
Rae Burrell
open this trade in the machine →

A starting point, not a prediction — each package is the fewest fair pieces the model can assemble, and a real deal would flex around roster fit and both front offices.

Chicago Sky teammates

Similar players